05-Jan-2004, 01:23 PM
First, kudos on Beyond Compare. I've been a faithful, registered user and evangelist since roughly 1997. The product is absolutely wonderful. I recently upgraded from the 1.8 version so I could make use of the data viewer plug-in. It exceeded my expectations--allowing me to specify not only key columns, but then to even have the ability to designate a tolerance on a numeric field!!!! Wonderful is the word the comes to mind.
Now for my wishlist regarding the data viewer!!! :-)
1. ** Critical ** Regarding the reporting options. The best from my perspective would be adding an HTML option. That makes sending results to end-users very easy and portable. The plain file report is almost usable except that it can leave out critical contextual information. For instance, in a compare of employees' salaries, the file report shows that line 'n' has a difference in the salary field, but you don't know for whom because only the salary is shown. If what I wrote here wasn't clear, let me know because it's critical.
2. Maybe this is already possible, but I didn't find a way to make it work. When running the compares from scripts, it appears that the plug-ins are ignored. Is there a way to use them in batch runs?
Kind regards,
Michael Rhodes
Deloitte
Now for my wishlist regarding the data viewer!!! :-)
1. ** Critical ** Regarding the reporting options. The best from my perspective would be adding an HTML option. That makes sending results to end-users very easy and portable. The plain file report is almost usable except that it can leave out critical contextual information. For instance, in a compare of employees' salaries, the file report shows that line 'n' has a difference in the salary field, but you don't know for whom because only the salary is shown. If what I wrote here wasn't clear, let me know because it's critical.
2. Maybe this is already possible, but I didn't find a way to make it work. When running the compares from scripts, it appears that the plug-ins are ignored. Is there a way to use them in batch runs?
Kind regards,
Michael Rhodes
Deloitte